AUGUST 2002 NO.4
>> The SoftSwitch-based Next Feneration Network

>> An Overview of the NGN

>> Some Tentative Ideas about High Capacity band width Management and Intelligent Technology over the Transfer Network

>> The Development Opportunity of the Multi-service SDH Transport Network

>> The Intelligentized Development of the Transmission Network

>> Development of Metropolitan Area Integrative Service Transfer Neywork

>> Intelligent Optical Networking

>> SURPASS,a Successful Next Generation Network

>> An Overview of the Next Generation Network and Nortel Network's Succession Solution

>> WebCall9000,PSTN-Based Telecommunications Grade Value-Added Service Solution

>> Video over DSL

>> The choice of network transmission protocol for digital video

>> The Attractive Stream Media Technology

>> Characteristics of the Application of GPRS

Some Tentative Ideas about High Capacity band

width Management and Intelligent Technology

over the Transfer Network

Key words: high capacity bandwidth cross management; intelligent technology; ASTN/ASON; signaling and routing protocols

1. Introduction
Over the transfer network, which serves as a common transfer platform for different telecommunications services, the growth of services, including voice, data, multimedia, leased lines and broadband service, and the development of the support networks such as the signaling network, the clock transfer network and the NM liaison network have made demand for transmission circuits. As a major resource of telecom operators, the transfer network should not only meet its own needs but also operates bandwidths, network elements and the network as a commodity. The behavior of the transfer network has a significant impact on service growth and market competitiveness of telecommu-nications operators.

SDH, the core technology of the transfer network, started to be applied in the early 1990s. Now, with its unique advantages, it has taken an absolutely predominant position. However, as the development of data and multimedia services represented by the Internet services continues and the situation of telecommunications operation changes, the environment of traffic transfer has change a lot. In providing packetized and new services, the traditional SDH transfer network has disadvantages such as complex service assignment, low bandwidth efficiency, high cost and poor network expandability. Fortunately, As optical-electronic technology advances, driven by market demand, there have emerged equipment and technologies such as SDH-based MSTP, high capacity bandwidth cross management and ASTN/ASON. Their application has given support to high capacity, intelligent and full service networks.

2. High Capacity Bandwidth Cross-management Equipment and Technology
High capacity bandwidth cross-management equipment is a new type of network element, which can integrate all the access and transfer facilities into a single network node. It combines the traditionally separated network elements such as independent ADM equipment, cross connect equipment, ATM and IP switch/router. Such integrity can materially reduce the cost and space occupancy of the equipment and eliminate the large amount of cable connection between the equipment and faults that cable connection may cause. The core technology of such equipment has the cross connecting capability of the high capacity VC-4/VC-4-nc or VC-4/3/12/VC-12-nc and provides large numbers of optical line interfaces of different rates and perfect network protection and recovery functions. Therefore, networking by this equipment enables flexible dispatch and dispersion of the traffic and easy capacity and network expansion, without having any impact on the existing network structure. Figure 1 shows the basic system structure of the equipment.

Control/maintenance/synchronous timing/power system
ATM switching module IP routing switching module
Core cross matrix matrix with cross connection


Figure 1: Basic system structure of high capacity bandwidth cross management

The high capacity bandwidth cross-management equipment is located at the core, or the hub of the transfer network, connecting different layers of the network and dispatching and managing the traffic flexibly. With its extra-high capacity cross-connecting capability and features of the optical line interfaces of different rates, it plays an important role in the transfer network in the following ways:
* To flexibly dispatch and disperse traffics, especially to set up and delete flexibly emergency and burst traffics;
* To disperse, merge, distribute and combine traffics, increasing channel utilization and forming a clear structure of the network channels;
* To perform traffic restoration throughout the network, improving the operating capacity of the network;
* To perform all kinds of protection functions;
* To connect the different layers of the network, resulting in a clear and orderly network structure, and to reduce the layers of the network by means of its integrity;
* To build up channels gradually according to demands, and expand the capacity and extend the network quickly and easily without having impact on the existing network structure and services;
* To reduce materially the cost and space occupancy of the equipment and eliminate the large amount of cable connection between the equipment and faults that cable connection causes.

With the advancement of optical-electronic technology and driven by market demand, broadband cross management equipment trends toward high capacity, intelligentalization and full service. To be specific, high capacity means cross connection capacity increasing from the present hundreds of Gbit/s to some Tbit/s and tens of Tbit/s while integrity is becoming increasingly higher and size smaller. Intelligentalization is discussed below. Full service means realization of full service processing capability by combining optical cross connection, ATM/IP and Tbit/s processing capability and linking realtime and broadband data services.

3. Intelligentalization of the Transfer Network
In order to adapt to the new traffic transfer environment and enhance market competitiveness of telecommunications operators, there came up intelligent technology of the transfer network, which is represented by the automatic switching transfer network (ASTN) and the automatic switching optical network (ASON). It may well be said that ASTN technology represents a qualitative transition in the development of the transfer network. In essence, the intelligentalization of the transfer network is the realization of automatic and dynamic configuration of network nodes and links, dynamic configuration of bandwidths of the links and automatic routing, and the provision of reliable network protection and recovery, by introducing signaling and routing protocols in the transfer network.

The following is a discussion about some issues concerning the ASTN.
* Network Management
In the traditional transfer network, network management is centralized, with the network elements having no intelligence and information about the entire network. This of course does not comply with dynamics of the network. In contrast, in the ASTN a new multi-layer management plane based on the transfer plane, the control plane and the signaling network substitutes for the NM system of the transfer network, forming a management mechanism that links centralized management and distributed intelligence. The main functions of the centralized management system are service provision management, such as virtual private network (VPN), service level agreement (SLA), traffic engineering (TE), billing and network resources management, and network auxiliary planning. A major feature of the ASTN is the realization of distributed intelligence, i.e., the intelligent network elements, which can enable network topology discovery, routing calculation, automatic link configuration, path management and control and traffic protection and restoration. Thus many functions can be performed automatically rather than manually.

* Control Model of Network Interconnection
There are two control models of network interconnection for the ASTN, one the overlay model and the other the peer model.

In the overlay model, the addressing scheme, the routing protocol and the signaling protocol at the customer layer run independently from those at the transfer layer. The two layers exchange information about the circuits, bandwidth requests, etc. via the user network interface (UNI). Its advantages are that the transfer layer can provide multi-service transfer as a common transparent platform; the development of the transfer network is not restricted by the customer layer; and the security of information in the transfer network is guaranteed. Its disadvantages are that the functions overlap and protocol conversion is complex.

In the peer Model, both the customer and transfer layers use the common control plane and the general multi-protocol label switching (GMPLS). Since they use the same addressing scheme, routing protocol and signaling protocol, there is no UNI protocol. The advantages of this model are that it enables protocol re-use, thus avoiding the development of a set of protocols for the control plane of the transfer network; it simplifies network management; and it promotes the convergence of control of the data and transfer networks. However, it is difficult to unify the standards of protocols of the customer and transfer layers, and information safety remains to be addressed.

Based on the above analysis, taking into account the present situation of the telecommunications operators and the characteristics of the traffic, it is desirable to adopt the overlay model in the near term. When IP-based service becomes the mainstream, the peer model will be the direction.

* Standards of Protocols
The key to the application of the ASTN is standardization. At present there are several international standard bodies which are engaged in the standardization of the ASTN, such as ITU-T, IETF,OIF and ODSI, each having its own focal point in the development of the ASTN protocol standards.

In ITU-T G.807/Y.1302, in the control plane, three very important interfaces are defined, depending on their positions and functions. They are UNI (User Network Interface), I-NNI (Internal Network Network Interface) and E-NNI (External Network Network Interface). The signaling and routing information is exchange via these interfaces. See Figure 2.


Figure 2: Relationship and interfaces between entities of ASTN

UNI is a bi-directional signaling interface between control entities of the service requesters (customers) and the service provider. The main functions it supports are user request access, call control, resources discovery, connection control and connection selection as well as call safety and authentication management.

I-NNI is a bi-directional signaling interface in an autonomous domain or between several autonomous domains having trusted relations with each other. The main functions it supports are resources discovery, connection control, connection selection and route hunting.

E-NNI is a bi-directional signaling interface between the control entities of different autonomous domains, used to set up cross-domain connections. The functions it supports include call control, resources discovery, connection control, connection selection and route hunting.

ITU-T's G.ASTN pays particular attention to the overall architecture and adopts the overlay model. Its related standards of protocols include, among others:

* G.8070 (needs of the ASTN) and G.8080 (architecture of the ASON), relating to the framework structure;
* G.7712, relating to the architecture and specifications of DCN (used to carry management information and control signaling);
* G.7713, relating to the signaling (distributed calling and connection management);
* G.7714, relating to automatic topology discovery;
* G. 7715, relating to routing; and
* G.7716, relating to link resources management.

By improving the existing protocols of the IP network, the IETF developed the GMPLS protocol, which can be used in various networks including the ASTN. This protocol pays particular attention to routing and signaling protocols and adopts the peer model. Its related standards of protocols include, among others:

* RSVP-TE (Resources Reservation Protocol-Traffic Engineering) and CR-LDP (Constrained Routing-Label Distribution Protocol), relating to signaling;
* OSPF (Open Shorted Path First) and IS-IS (Inter-domain System-Inter-domain System), relating to routing; and
* LMP, relating to link management.

The OIF standard adopts the overlay model. Its related standards of protocols include, among others, O-UNI and O-NNI. The establishment of the O-UNI standard (Version 1.0) has finished and that of Version 2.0 is underway. The establishment of the O-NNI standard is expected to finish at end-2002.

4. Conclusion
Thanks to the introduction into the transfer network of high capacity bandwidth management equipment with high integrity, high capacity and multi-service processing capability, intelligent network element-based distributed network management, automatic dynamically configured network nodes and links, dynamically configured link bandwidth, automatic routing and intelligent technology that provides highly reliable network protection and recovery, the telecommunications operators has got much benefit in cost, flexibility and efficiency in many respects such as network structure, traffic dispatch, network operation and maintenance, network management and optimization. Thus, their competitiveness in the telecommunications arena will be greatly enhanced.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Du Wei: Graduated from the BUPT in 1988, he is currently vice chief engineer of Beijing Institute of Telecommunications Planning and Design. Having long been engaged in the planning, networking and design of large-scale local transfer networks, he is experienced both practically and theoretically.